The company argued that tracking users for ad-targeting purposes was a standard business practice, and one that its users agreed to when signing up for the service. The suit, which sought class-action status, accused the tech giant of violating the man’s privacy by tracking his activities on cancer center websites outside the social network - and collecting details about his possible treatment options - without his permission.įacebook persuaded a federal judge to dismiss the case. In 2016, for example, a Missouri man with metastatic cancer sued Facebook. That has not stopped angry users from airing their grievances over Facebook’s practices. “But of course we can do more to help people understand how Facebook works and the choices they have.” “There are common parts of people’s experience on the internet,” Matt Steinfeld, a Facebook spokesman, said in a statement. Zuckerberg how many non-Facebook sites used various kinds of Facebook tracking software: “Is the number over 100 million?” He said he’d have to get back to her with an answer. When internet users venture to other sites, Facebook can still monitor what they are doing with software like its ubiquitous “Like” and “Share” buttons, and something called Facebook Pixel - invisible code that’s dropped onto the other websites that allows that site and Facebook to track users’ activity. If Facebook is being singled out for such practices, it is because it is a market leader and its stockpiling of personal data is at the core of its $40.6 billion annual business.įacebook uses a number of software tools to do this tracking. Many other companies, including news organizations like The New York Times, mine information about users for marketing purposes.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |